Parity Striping of Disk Arrays: Low-Cost Reliable Storage with Acceptable Throughput.
Jim Gray, Bob Horst, Mark Walker:
Parity Striping of Disk Arrays: Low-Cost Reliable Storage with Acceptable Throughput.
VLDB 1990: 148-161@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/vldb/GrayHW90,
author = {Jim Gray and
Bob Horst and
Mark Walker},
editor = {Dennis McLeod and
Ron Sacks-Davis and
Hans-J{\"o}rg Schek},
title = {Parity Striping of Disk Arrays: Low-Cost Reliable Storage with
Acceptable Throughput},
booktitle = {16th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, August
13-16, 1990, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, Proceedings},
publisher = {Morgan Kaufmann},
year = {1990},
isbn = {1-55860-149-X},
pages = {148-161},
ee = {db/conf/vldb/GrayHW90.html},
crossref = {DBLP:conf/vldb/90},
bibsource = {DBLP, http://dblp.uni-trier.de}
}
Abstract
An analysis of mirrored discs and of RAID5 shows that mirrors have considerably better throughput, measured as requests/second on random requests of arbitrary size (up to IMB).
Mirrors have comparable or better response time for requests of reasonable size (less than 1OOKB).
But mirrors have a 100% storage penalty: storing the data twice.
Parity striping is a data layout that stripes the parity across the discs, but does not stripe the data.
Parity striping has throughput almost as good as mirrors, and has cost/GB comparable to RAID5 designs -- combing the advantages of both for high-traffic disc resident data.
Parity striping has additional fault containment and software benefits as well.
Parity striping sacrifices the high data transfer rates of RAID designs for high throughput.
It is argued that response time and throughput are preferable performance metrics.
Copyright © 1990 by the VLDB Endowment.
Permission to copy without fee all or part of this material is granted provided that the copies are not made or
distributed for direct commercial advantage, the VLDB
copyright notice and the title of the publication and
its date appear, and notice is given that copying
is by the permission of the Very Large Data Base
Endowment. To copy otherwise, or to republish, requires
a fee and/or special permission from the Endowment.
Online Paper
CDROM Version: Load the CDROM "Volume 1 Issue 5, VLDB '89-'97" and ...
DVD Version: Load ACM SIGMOD Anthology DVD 1" and ...
Printed Edition
Dennis McLeod, Ron Sacks-Davis, Hans-Jörg Schek (Eds.):
16th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, August 13-16, 1990, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, Proceedings.
Morgan Kaufmann 1990, ISBN 1-55860-149-X
References
- [AS400]
- ...
- [Chen]
- ...
- [Gelb]
- Jack P. Gelb:
System-Managed Storage.
IBM Systems Journal 28(1): 77-103(1989)
- [Hardy]
- ...
- [Patterson]
- David A. Patterson, Garth A. Gibson, Randy H. Katz:
A Case for Redundant Arrays of Inexpensive Disks (RAID).
SIGMOD Conference 1988: 109-116
- [Bitton1]
- Dina Bitton, Jim Gray:
Disk Shadowing.
VLDB 1988: 331-338
- [Bitton2]
- Dina Bitton:
Arm Scheduling in Shadowed Disks.
COMPCON 1989: 132-136
- [Chan]
- ...
- [Katzman]
- ...
- [Kim]
- Michelle Y. Kim:
Synchronized Disk Interleaving.
IEEE Trans. Computers 35(11): 978-988(1986)
- [Schneider]
- Donovan A. Schneider, David J. DeWitt:
A Performance Evaluation of Four Parallel Join Algorithms in a Shared-Nothing Multiprocessor Environment.
SIGMOD Conference 1989: 110-121
- [Schulze]
- M. Schulze, Garth A. Gibson, Randy H. Katz, David A. Patterson:
How Reliable is a RAID?
COMPCON 1989: 118-123
- [Scranton]
- ...
- [Wilhelm]
- Neil C. Wilhelm:
A General Model for the Performance of Disk Systems.
J. ACM 24(1): 14-31(1977)
Copyright © Fri Mar 12 17:22:50 2010
by Michael Ley (ley@uni-trier.de)